Here's
Marc Wicclair's argument against censoring pornography from Team Porn's PowerPoint presentation in class:
P1) Pornography sometimes depicts degrading but still legal practices, and censoring the depiction of legal practices is odd.
P2) Censoring porn may cause danger due to the resulting vague laws of what counts as "degrading."
P3) It's legally difficult to determine which films/photos actually condone the bad practices they depict.
P4) There's no solid evidence that porn causes more violence against women (in fact, it may prevent some by being cathartic).
P5) Censorship is only justified in cases of “clear and present danger,” and porn doesn’t cause any obvious “clear and present danger."
P6) Censorship would be the rule rather than an exception, and such pervasive censorship is incompatible with truly free society.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C) Pornography shouldn't be censored.